Exciting news for boating enthusiasts in Western Australia! The Shire of Murray is set to transform the South Yunderup waterfront with a brand-new boat ramp and floating jetty, thanks to a significant funding boost from the State Government. But here’s where it gets interesting: while this upgrade promises smoother launches for recreational boaters, some locals are already voicing concerns about the project’s priorities. Is this a step forward or a missed opportunity? Let’s dive in.
The State Government has allocated $721,257 to the Shire of Murray as part of a $2.4 million investment aimed at enhancing seven regional boating facilities. This funding will replace the aging Batavia Quays Boat Ramp and introduce a new floating jetty, designed to improve accessibility and efficiency for the region’s 100,000 boat owners. Transport Minister Rita Saffioti emphasized the government’s commitment to supporting local facility managers in maintaining high-quality recreational spaces. She highlighted the 30-year success of the Recreational Boating Facilities Scheme, which has been funded in part by boat registration fees—a community-driven approach to infrastructure improvement.
But here’s where it gets controversial: While the Shire celebrated the opening of a floating jetty and gangway at the same site in May 2023, some locals argue the ramp itself was long overdue for repairs. One Facebook user bluntly stated, ‘The ramp has been in dire need of fixing for years. It’s a double ramp that’s only usable down the middle—talk about frustrating!’ Another added, ‘It looks great, but functionality should come first. A lopsided ramp is a headache for locals.’ These comments raise a thought-provoking question: Are aesthetic upgrades overshadowing practical needs?
The Shire, however, defends the project, noting that the new jetty’s design allows for future expansions, including ramp replacements and additional jetty options. This forward-thinking approach aims to meet growing community demands. And this is the part most people miss: The scheme isn’t just about immediate fixes—it’s about building a sustainable infrastructure for years to come.
As the project moves forward, it’s clear that balancing immediate repairs with long-term development is no easy task. What do you think? Is the Shire on the right track, or should they have prioritized fixing the ramp first? Share your thoughts in the comments—we’d love to hear your perspective!
